When Law Enforcement Enters the Courthouse: A Legal Perspective on Jurisdiction and Justice

Earlier this month, ICE agents detained a man inside the Baltimore City courthouse—a facility traditionally viewed as a neutral, protected environment for due process and legal advocacy. The Sheriff’s Office publicly criticized the arrest, calling it “detrimental to justice.”

The event sparked legal and ethical questions beyond immigration politics:

• What jurisdiction do federal agents have inside state courthouses?
• How do such actions affect public trust in the justice system?

This isn’t about taking sides. It’s about understanding where different branches of law enforcement intersect—and what that means for courts, communities, and clients.

Courthouses exist to ensure access to justice—regardless of race, immigration status, or socioeconomic background. They are not sanctuary spaces, but they do function as essential neutral zones within the justice system.

Courthouses: Neutral Ground, Not No-Man’s-Land

When enforcement actions—especially by federal agencies—occur inside these walls, they risk undermining public confidence in the fairness and accessibility of the legal process.
• Will victims hesitate to report crimes?
• Will witnesses fear retaliation or detention?
• Will defendants skip court, fearing unrelated consequences?
Those are practical, not hypothetical, concerns.

Jurisdictional Tension and Legal Disruption

At the core of this issue is jurisdictional clarity—or lack thereof. Local sheriffs and state courts operate under mandates to maintain orderly, fair proceedings. Federal immigration authorities have their own enforcement priorities.

When those missions clash—particularly without coordination—it disrupts more than schedules. It disrupts the legal contract between courts and communities.

This isn’t about fault. It’s about balance. Every courthouse functions on structure, procedure, and trust. Any action that chips away at that—even unintentionally—deserves scrutiny.

How This Affects Clients and Community Members

At Cochran & Chhabra, we regularly counsel clients navigating legal proceedings where uncertainty around enforcement creates fear or hesitation. Our message remains clear and consistent:

• Know your rights
• Don’t skip court
• Talk to your lawyer before you make assumptions based on headlines

Everyone deserves to approach the justice system with confidence, not fear. Especially when the stakes involve family, freedom, or future opportunities.

Final Thought: Enforcement Must Respect the Process

Laws evolve. Procedures adapt. But the core principle—that the courthouse is where justice is pursued, not avoided—must remain intact.

Enforcement has a rightful place in our legal system. But where and how it’s executed matters just as much as the law being enforced.

The courtroom is not a battleground. It’s a cornerstone. And preserving its integrity benefits everyone.

Follow our blog for such more such information